Dialog Semiconductor customer support - SLG46826 https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/resource-keywords/slg46826 en SLG46824 vs. SLG46826 EEprom https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/slg46824-vs-slg46826-eeprom < div class = "字段field-name-taxonomy-forums字段-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above">
Forums: 

Hello. We are planning to use either the SLG46824 or SLG46826 device in some new products and really welcome the multi-time programming over I2C of these components - simply due to lower risk vs. use of OTP.

We have built up the IP over this last weekend and the simulation is showing promise to be correct. Will test against the true hardware this week on your kits.

A few questions on this component and sourcing:

1) The pricing appears to be the same for 100 pcs of either component. Are these supplied on cut tape? How can we purchase on T&R with the necessary leader tape for automated SMT mounting of the PCBA? After our validation, we are fine to purchase on full T&R qty. Is that the only way to receive with the leader tape and in full T&R qty?

2) What is the difference between the SLG46824 vs. SLG46826 with respect to the internal 2k EEprom? It appears both devices have an internal 2k EEprom but the BLOCK diagram inside the SLG46824 datasheet does not offer the "2K EEprom Emulation" block in the graphic. Is that a documentation error?

3) Any plans to offer the same features of I2C programming AND have internal ASM support? Would be nice to have which appear to be missing from these 2 devices.

Finally, in building our 3 stage reset sequencer IP and using the simulator with DLY0 and/or DLY1 - the simulator would not show us any changes to our expected delays. That is, the rise of the DLYx output followed the VDD rail when we expected some programmed delay for this rise. Not sure if this was our fault as after investing a few hours and introducing other DLYx blocks, the simulation worked fine. Not logical but that was our experience. In the end, we do not believe we did anything different but the simulation started to work (using the PROBES to monitor). Will see if we can replicate the quirk but for now, since we appear to be operational, it is not a worry.

For closure, will test on the hardware kits.

Thanks!

Device: 
Device Number: 
SLG46826 SLG46824
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:13:57 +0000 mon2 345035 at https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/slg46824-vs-slg46826-eeprom#comments
SLG46826 factory setting for IO6? https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/slg46826-factory-setting-io6 < div class = "字段field-name-taxonomy-forums字段-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above">
Forums: 

With IO6 connected to SDA, it seems to fail to program, giving the "Chip is absent or misplaced" error.

During the programming attempt, SDA reaches 3.3V about 1mS after starting, but goes to 0 at about 3.3mS.

Is a factory-set value for IO6 being asserted then, and if so, can it be changed?

Keywords: 
Device: 
Device Number: 
SLG46826V
Mon, 08 Apr 2019 17:56:20 +0000 lottabull 299591 at https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/slg46826-factory-setting-io6#comments
ACMP_H/ACMP_L Difference https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/acmphacmpl-difference < div class = "字段field-name-taxonomy-forums字段-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above">
Forums: 

Hi,

Could you please let me know what is the difference between ACMP_H and ACMP_L in SLG46826 GPAK IC?

Best regards

Keywords: 
Device: 
Device Number: 
SLG46826V
Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:01:25 +0000 Yurii Shchebel 193500 at https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/forums/post/greenpak-and-greenfet-questions/acmphacmpl-difference#comments