Device:
⚠️
Hi there.. thanks for coming to the forums. Exciting news! we’re now in the process of moving to our new forum platform that will offer better functionality and is contained within the main Dialog website. All posts and accounts have been migrated. We’re now accepting traffic on the new forum only - please POST any new threads at//www.wsdof.com/support. We’ll be fixing bugs / optimising the searching and tagging over the coming days.
Hi there.. thanks for coming to the forums. Exciting news! we’re now in the process of moving to our new forum platform that will offer better functionality and is contained within the main Dialog website. All posts and accounts have been migrated. We’re now accepting traffic on the new forum only - please POST any new threads at//www.wsdof.com/support. We’ll be fixing bugs / optimising the searching and tagging over the coming days.
Hi jenswet,
The SDK1.0.14.1081_hotfix_001 is a patch on top of SDK1.0.14.1081 due to SweynTooth Vulnerability issue. Dialog is providing a page with status updates on the Sweyntooth vulnerability issue.
//www.wsdof.com/sweyntooth-bluetooth-low-energy-vulnerability
Here you will find all the available hot-fix patches and vulnerability issue description for each product. Regarding the SDK1.0.14.1081_hotfix_001, in order to add the patch, please follow the INSTALL.TXT. An sdk.diff file is also provided within the hotfix path. We’re not disclosing the changes as security related policy. You can be assured that the hotfix is only for the Sweyntooth Vulnerability issue
Thanks, PM_Dialog
Hello PM_Dialog,
I applied the patch.
Interestingly my project can't create the elf file afterwards with the same settings.
Why is the hotfix changing the memory usage so much? Is this expected?
Best Regards,
Jens
Hi Jens,
Do you mean that with the same project you are getting this error when the patch is applied?
Have you done any other modifications? What is the device that you are using? DA14682 or DA14683?
The RETENTION_RAM0 collects all the zero-initialized data that should be placed in the retained RAM.
Thanks, PM_Dialog
Hi PM_Dialog,
Thanks for getting back to me.
Yes exactly the same project. I did not modify anything except the sdk patch and did a clean build afterwards.
It's a DA14683 device.
Best regards,
Jens
Hi jenswet,
It is expected to have an increase of the memory usage due to the hotfix patch, because the code for the BLE is increased and some buffers for BLE too. That’s why you are getting this error with the same project. You must adjust the memory areas accordingly, increasing the RetRAM0 section.
Thanks, PM_Dialog